GitHub Copilot

The industry-standard AI autocomplete tool that lives inside your favorite IDE, providing quick single-line suggestions as you type.

🛡️ OUR SCORES ARE INDEPENDENT & READER SUPPORTED

We never accept payment for product scores, placements, or rankings. Scores are derived strictly from verified facts.

All criteria & scores

10 criteria · Scored based on your profile: Expert · Vibe Coder · Individual developer
⚡ How we score
CriteriaClaude CodeCursorGammaGitHub Copilot
⚙️
Code Editing Quality
Accuracy, context, refactoring
9.8/107.0/103.0/109.2/10
🤖
AI Agent Capabilities
Autonomy, task completion
8.8/106.0/102.5/108.8/10
💻
Terminal / Workflow Fit
CLI shortcuts, flow
9.7/106.1/102.0/107.5/10
Performance & Speed
Response time, efficiency
9.3/107.0/103.5/108.8/10
🔌
Integration & Ecosystem
Tools, extensions, platforms
8.9/108.0/103.0/109.8/10
🏷️
Pricing & Value
Cost vs what you get
9.0/106.5/102.5/108.5/10
🔒
Privacy & Data Control
Data handling, privacy
8.5/108.1/104.0/107.8/10
📚
Documentation & Learning
Ease to learn & resources
9.5/107.0/104.0/108.8/10
🛡️
Reliability & Stability
Uptime, bugs, consistency
9.2/106.5/102.5/107.5/10
🎯
Use Case Fit (Your Profile)
Expert · Vibe Coder · Individual
9.7/106.8/102.5/109.8/10
Overall Score Out of 10097/10043/10012/10095/100

What the scores mean for you

Best fit for your profile
Claude Code and GitHub Copilot score highest for your needs.
Top pick: Claude Code
Lower fit
Gamma is not recommended for your profile and use case.
Why: Limited developer-focused capabilities.

Detailed strengths & weaknesses

Claude Code

97/100
Strengths
  • Exceptional code understanding
  • Powerful autonomous agent
  • Perfect terminal integration
  • Built for developers
  • Strong privacy by design
Weaknesses
  • Higher price point
  • Learning curve for new users
View full analysis →

Cursor

43/100
Strengths
  • Great UI and developer UX
  • Fast inline suggestions
  • Good multi-file edits
Weaknesses
  • Privacy concerns for some
  • Subscription required
  • Not fully autonomous
View full analysis →

Gamma

12/100
Strengths
  • Beautiful slide generation
  • Fast text to presentation
  • Easy to use
Weaknesses
  • Not a code tool
  • Limited customization
  • Not for developers
View full analysis →

GitHub Copilot

95/100
Strengths
  • Widely supported
  • Great IDE integration
  • Mature & reliable
  • Broad language support
Weaknesses
  • Less autonomous
  • Limited context vs agents
View full analysis →

Where this page's facts come from

9 sources actually cited on this page. Every fact below links to the exact sentence it came from.

📄
The maker's own pages
GitHub, docs.github.com, github.blog +1 more
📰
Press & review sites
dev.to
🌐
Other
bakerlaw.com
🌐
Youtube Video
youtube.com
🌐
News Article
theregister.com
🌐
Forum Post
github.com

Where the score comes from

Breakdown for: Privacy-focused

No rounding, no editorial nudge. Each fact carries an evidence-weighted impact multiplier (Maker claims count 70%; Laboratory measurements count 100%).

The fact, and the words it came fromEvidenceSumEffect
Every product starts here — neither good nor bad50
Free Pro Tier Trains By Default 2026
If you use the Free, Pro, or Pro+ version of Copilot, starting April 24 2026 GitHub will start using what you type and the code it suggests to train its AI -- unless you turn a setting off yourself.
From April 24 onward, interaction data—specifically inputs, outputs, code snippets, and associated context—from Copilot Free, Pro, and Pro+ users will be used to train and improve our AI models unless they opt out.
the maker's own claim
counts 70%
-25 × 0.70-17.5
Individual Training Opt Out Setting Name
There is a real switch in your GitHub account settings called "Allow GitHub to use my data for AI model training." Switching it to "Disabled" stops GitHub from using your code to train its AI.
Select the "Allow GitHub to use my data for AI model training" dropdown menu and click Disabled.
the maker's own claim
counts 70%
+25 × 0.70+17.5
Business Enterprise Excluded From Training
If a company pays for Copilot Business or Copilot Enterprise, GitHub promises in writing that it will not use that company's code to teach (train) its AI. It is a contract promise, not just a checkbox.
GitHub does not use Copilot Business or Copilot Enterprise customer data to train AI models. Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers' data is protected under GitHub's Data Protection Agreement, which prohibits such use without customer authorization.
the maker's own claim
counts 70%
+24 × 0.70+16.8
Generative Ai Terms No Training Without Consent
In GitHub's official contract for its AI services, it promises it will not use what you type in or what the AI writes back to train its models, unless you specifically gave it written permission to do so.
GitHub will not use Inputs or Outputs to train generative AI models, unless you have given us documented instructions to do so.
the maker's own claim
counts 70%
+20 × 0.70+14.0
Copilot Camoleak Secret Leak Vulnerability
Security researchers found a bug nicknamed "CamoLeak": an attacker could hide secret instructions inside a GitHub pull request, invisible to humans. When someone asked Copilot Chat to review that code, it would secretly search the repository for passwords and private files, then sneak the stolen data out one character at a time using tiny invisible images. GitHub has since patched it.
Researcher Omer Mayraz of Legit Security disclosed a critical vulnerability, dubbed CamoLeak, that could be used to trick Copilot Chat into exfiltrating secrets, private source code, and even descriptions of unpublished vulnerabilities from repositories. The flaw was scored 9.6 on the CVSS scale in the disclosure.
reported by owners and reviewers
counts 80%
-15 × 0.80-12.0
Agentic Team Cost
Teams running complex, automated code refactoring systems (like AI agents) will see a huge cost increase, potentially reaching $600 to $1,200 per person monthly, much higher than the old flat rate.
Early community estimates: $600–1,200 per developer per month, up from $39 per user.
reported by owners and reviewers
counts 80%
-13 × 0.80-10.4
Free Tier Prior Optout Grandfathered
If you had already told GitHub "don't use my data" before this 2026 change happened, GitHub kept that choice for you. You don't have to go redo it, and your data still stays out of training.
If you previously opted out of the setting allowing GitHub to collect this data for product improvements, your preference has been retained—your choice is preserved, and your data will not be used for training unless you opt in.
the maker's own claim
counts 70%
+13 × 0.70+9.1
Copilot Lawsuit Ninth Circuit Appeal Pending
The GitHub Copilot lawsuit is not over. Part of it was thrown out by a lower court, and that decision is now being appealed to a higher federal court (the Ninth Circuit), which heard arguments in February 2026 but has not ruled yet.
The district court's dismissal of DMCA claims is currently on appeal before the Ninth Circuit. The Ninth Circuit held oral argument on February 11, 2026.
reported by owners and reviewers
counts 80%
-11 × 0.80-8.8
Public Code Duplication Filter
Before showing you a suggestion, Copilot checks it against a giant index of public GitHub code to see if it copied a chunk (about 150 characters, roughly two lines) from somewhere else, so it can warn you and show the license of the matching code.
Copilot code referencing compares potential code suggestions and the surrounding code of about 150 characters against an index of all public repositories on GitHub.com.
the maker's own claim
counts 70%
+12 × 0.70+8.4
Heavy Chat User Cost
If you use the chat feature very extensively for complex coding or reasoning, you should expect your bill to jump significantly, potentially hitting between $150 and $250, plus the usual $39 fee.
Uses Copilot Chat extensively — 30–40 sessions daily on Claude Sonnet 4.6 for complex reasoning tasks. Estimated monthly chat cost: $150–250 on top of the $39 Pro+ subscription.
reported by owners and reviewers
counts 80%
-10 × 0.80-8.0
Free Plan Price
You can test out the product without paying anything upfront.
Free For getting started with GitHub Copilot. $ 0 USD Get started Open in VS Code
the maker's own claim
counts 70%
+11 × 0.70+7.7
Loss Of Usage Ceiling
The system no longer automatically stop working if you use it too much; you must manually set up an account block feature in your billing settings to prevent unexpected overspending.
Previously, heavy usage was bounded by the flat monthly fee. Now there is no ceiling unless you explicitly set a spending limit in the billing dashboard — and by default, GitHub only sends a notification when a limit is reached rather than stopping usage. You must manually enable "Stop usage when budget limit is reached" to create a hard cap.
the maker's own claim
counts 70%
-11 × 0.70-7.7
Ide Compatibility
Works in virtually any code editor you already use without forcing you to switch IDEs.
GitHub Copilot provides inline AI code completions and chat assistant across popular IDEs.
the maker's own claim
counts 70%
+11 × 0.70+7.7
High Usage Cost Risk
If you use Copilot for complex, extended tasks (like having an artificial intelligence plan code independently), the cost could surprise you and might exceed what a fixed monthly plan suggested.
The problem is the loss of the safety net and the surprise of discovering that frontier-model agentic work is substantially more expensive than a $39/month flat fee implied.
reported by owners and reviewers
counts 80%
-8 × 0.80-6.4
Pro Plan Price
The Pro plan costs $10 monthly.
Pro plan $10 per month
the maker's own claim
counts 70%
+9 × 0.70+6.3
Entry Pricing
The most affordable mainstream AI coding assistant subscription available.
Cheapest option on the market; inline autocomplete saves hours of typing boilerplate code.
the maker's own claim
counts 70%
+9 × 0.70+6.3
Inline Suggestions Free Plan
If you use the free version, you can still receive real-time code suggestion help.
Inline suggestions Free plan Included
the maker's own claim
counts 70%
+8 × 0.70+5.6
Copilot Lawsuit No Direct Infringement Claim
There is a big lawsuit against GitHub Copilot (called Doe v. GitHub) about open-source code licenses. But even though people call it "the AI copyright case," it has never actually accused GitHub of directly stealing anyone's copyrighted code -- it is about smaller license and contract rules instead.
While this case is touted as the first class action copyright case against an LLM provider, it has never included any claims of direct or indirect copyright infringement.
reported by owners and reviewers
counts 80%
-7 × 0.80-5.6
Pro Plus Plan Price
This mid-tier plan costs $39 a month for sophisticated or complex development needs.
Pro+ For more complex development with premium models. $ 39 USD per user / month Get started Everything in Pro and:
the maker's own claim
counts 70%
+5 × 0.70+3.5
Copilot Business Subscription Price
The business team plan costs $19 per user each month.
Copilot Business: $19/user/month
the maker's own claim
counts 70%
+5 × 0.70+3.5
Variable Additional Usage
On top of the purchased subscription, there is extra usage capacity available that might fluctuate in value or availability.
Flex allotment Variable additional usage on top of your base. Flex allotments may change over time.
the maker's own claim
counts 70%
-5 × 0.70-3.5
Copilot Enterprise Subscription Price
The enterprise team plan costs $39 per user each month.
Copilot Enterprise: $39/user/month
the maker's own claim
counts 70%
+4 × 0.70+2.8
Fit for “Privacy-focused”50 + 29.3 = 79

A score measures fit for a situation, not quality in the abstract. The same product can score 99 for one person and 43 for another without either number being wrong.